Build your social promotion mix by assigning every post one primary job—Discovery, Trust, Proof, Conversation, Invitation or Continuity—then choosing a native, policy-compatible format for the channel. Start from the approved asset library and ordinary weekly capacity, fill missing jobs rather than fixed percentages, and review whether the mix creates a clear public creator story without overwhelming production or fan commitments.
This template plans formats across channels. It does not choose the channel, prescribe posting cadence or track experiments. Use the promotion strategy guide for channel direction and this page after the creator has a clear public role.
Start with the public creator promise
Write the safe-for-work identity, recurring topics and public value in one sentence. The social mix should make that sentence increasingly believable. If posts cannot be connected to the promise, a larger mix will create noise rather than useful variety.
Name the intended adult audience by interest and context, not invented demographics. A creator may speak to costume enthusiasts, fitness learners, glamour photography fans or people who value candid lifestyle updates. The same asset can require a different job and explanation for each.
Record creator boundaries, privacy decisions and topics excluded from public channels. Those constraints shape the mix. Do not compensate for a narrow public boundary by using more suggestive material than the creator or platform allows.
Audit the approved promotion library
List approved assets with subject, format, orientation, date, public-use permission, identity exposure and related OnlyFans content. Mark whether each can support discovery, process, proof, conversation or invitation. Keep original files and approval context connected.
Identify over-supply and missing jobs. A library may contain many polished images but little process or personality, producing proof without trust. Another may have conversation clips but no clear theme. The gap informs the next shoot brief.
Use the content batching workflow to create missing assets efficiently. This mix template decides what public jobs the batch must serve.
Separate Discovery, Trust and Proof
Discovery content earns attention from someone with little context. It should be understandable quickly and connected to a recognisable interest. Trust content reveals process, voice, boundaries or consistency. Proof content demonstrates the promised craft, format or series.
One post can support several jobs, but name the primary one so the creative choice is clear. A costume reveal may discover new viewers; a build breakdown from the same project may deepen trust; a finished series gallery may provide proof. Copying the same caption across all three loses that distinction.
Avoid unsupported proof. Public results, earnings or subscriber claims require reliable evidence and context and usually distract from the creator's actual value. Demonstrate the work itself.
Use Conversation and Invitation with restraint
Conversation posts ask a bounded question the creator genuinely wants to answer. Choose prompts related to the public theme and reserve response capacity. A flood of generic comments may not help the creator learn or build a relevant audience.
Invitation content gives one current, allowed next step after the profile has established context. It might direct someone to explore the profile, follow a series or use a permitted landing-page path. Check each channel's current rules for sexual solicitation, adult services and links.
Do not turn every post into an invitation. Repetition can weaken the public creator story and may conflict with community expectations. Let the worksheet reveal when the mix lacks useful discovery, trust or proof.
Adapt each job to the native channel
Write the job first, then adapt the asset. A process story may become a short vertical demonstration on TikTok, a sequence or Reel on Instagram, a discussion-led image post on Reddit, or a concise observation on X. Keep the creator identity while respecting native context.
Review crop, opening frame, caption, alt text where available, title, link treatment and comment plan. Reusing source material is sensible; publishing the identical treatment everywhere is not automatically efficient if it underperforms the channel's basic format.
Save each adaptation as its own record linked to the source asset. That prevents an edit approved for one platform from being mistaken for universal approval.
Plan from Capacity, not a content ratio
Mark ordinary production and response time after OnlyFans content, fan commitments and rest. Select the smallest set of public posts that covers the most important missing jobs. Do not begin with a universal split between education, personality and promotion.
A new account may need enough Discovery and Proof to explain itself. An established audience may need more Continuity or Conversation. The mix changes with the current constraint. Record why each slot exists so it can be removed when the job changes.
Place the selected slots into the weekly content schedule. Keep a buffer for moderation, reshoots and creator wellbeing.
Copy the Social promotion mix matrix
| Job | Purpose | Possible formats | Evidence to review |
|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery | Give a relevant stranger a reason to stop and recognise the creator's theme. | Short demonstration, striking safe-for-work visual, useful observation or community-native post. | Topic recognition, relevant replies and profile visits where available. |
| Trust | Show voice, consistency, process and boundaries over time. | Behind-the-scenes process, routine, answer, personal perspective or recurring series update. | Repeat viewers, substantive questions and sustained creator capacity. |
| Proof | Demonstrate that the public promise is real without unsupported results claims. | Finished work, before-and-after process, series archive, craft detail or current public sample. | Visitor comprehension and specific interest in the demonstrated theme. |
| Conversation | Invite a response the creator is prepared to acknowledge. | Choice, prompt, question, poll or opinion with a bounded topic. | Relevant interaction quality and workload, not raw comment volume alone. |
| Invitation | Offer one policy-compatible next step after sufficient context exists. | Profile exploration, series follow, current landing page or another allowed action. | Successful handoff and destination continuity where measurable. |
| Continuity | Help existing followers recognise what returns and when. | Series marker, recurring format or progress update. | Recognition, return questions and delivery sustainability. |
Planning row
Post ID | Primary job | Audience context | Source asset | Channel | Native format | Policy check | Public promise | Next step | Owner | Publish status | Response plan | Evidence | Keep, change or stop
Review the mix as a system
At the review event, group observations by job and channel. Which themes drew relevant attention? Which posts helped people understand the creator? Which invitation paths worked technically? Which formats consumed more time than the learning justified?
Keep observation separate from attribution. Profile visits after a post are useful context; they do not prove subscriptions came from it. Write competing explanations such as another campaign, existing audience loyalty or changes at the destination.
Decide one job to strengthen, one format to revise, one low-value slot to stop and one uncertainty to test. Update the next mix instead of merely increasing volume.
Build a capacity-first sample week
Imagine a creator has one approved process clip, one finished portrait set, one written opinion and one recurring-series update. Assign the process clip to Trust, the portrait reveal to Proof, the opinion to Conversation and the series update to Continuity. If discovery is the current constraint, adapt one strong opening from the process or reveal rather than commissioning an unrelated fifth asset.
Choose the primary channel treatment for each job, then decide whether a second-channel adaptation adds value. The process clip might suit vertical video; the written observation may suit a discussion-led network. Record the editing, caption and response work separately so reuse does not appear free.
Add one Invitation only after the public profile and destination have been checked. If current channel rules do not permit the intended destination or wording, remove that slot and let the public creator content stand on its own. Do not replace it with concealed solicitation.
At week end, review whether each job was actually delivered and what it cost the creator in time. The sample does not prescribe four posts or a fixed order. It demonstrates how a limited approved library can cover several distinct communication jobs without a universal ratio.
Sample-week decision record
Constraint | Missing job | Approved asset | Primary channel | Native treatment | Adaptation work | Policy review | Response capacity | Publish result | Relevant observation | Creator effort | Next mix decision
Carry forward only decisions, not an obligation to repeat every slot. If one job is already well supplied by the visible profile, use the next week to strengthen a genuine gap or reduce workload.
Sources and limitations
Apply current channel rules to each adaptation, including TikTok's Community Guidelines, Instagram's Community Guidelines and the relevant Reddit-wide and local community rules. The job matrix is original SirenCY editorial methodology.
Limitations: no universal content mix guarantees reach, conversion or retention. Available formats, policy treatment, audience context and creator capacity change. This template organises decisions; it does not replace channel selection, cadence testing or attribution.
Review the mix by jobs completed, not volume posted
At the end of the cycle, label each published asset with its intended job and whether it was delivered in the native format planned. Look for missing jobs rather than chasing a fixed percentage. A feed full of discovery clips may still lack trust or proof; a feed full of invitations may give a new visitor no reason to continue.
Record production time, moderation load, reusable source asset and the next treatment for each row. Retire a format when it repeatedly exceeds capacity, attracts the wrong audience or cannot be published comfortably within current rules. Reuse should transform the source for the channel, not duplicate the same crop and caption everywhere.
The template is a planning and review aid. It does not establish an ideal content ratio or guarantee traffic. Change one mix decision at a time and keep the destination promise stable long enough to understand what was actually tested.